Quality Web Content

One stop shop for free articles & web content

88 articles on writing web content and intranet content

 
QWC home
Articles
Contented courses
Contented.com
Contact
About Rachel

Stanford's web credibility study


In this study, 2,684 people evaluated the credibility of two live web sites randomly assigned from one of 10 content categories. A total of 100 sites were assessed. The Stanford credibility team analysed the comments to discover how consumers evaluated credibility online.

They found that the average consumer paid far more attention to the look of a site than to its content. The team concluded that people first vet sites according to their design look. If a site passes the test, they then apply other criteria.

The tone of writing was something people used to assess credibility. Participant comments included writing time as a critierion 9.0 percent of the time, usually in a negative way. People generally said that slang or sensationalism hurt a site's credibility, while a straightforward, friendly writing style boosted credibility.

Stanford Web Credibility Research has the complete report (PDF, 1.2 MB, 105 pages).

The report was updated in November 2002.

 

Link to home. QWC home     Link to contact. contact     Link to Contented.com. Contented.com     Link to writingforgovernment.com. Writing for Government
©2010 Rachel McAlpine PO Box 19184 Wellington 6149 New Zealand